The Word of God · The Dipper, Volume IV
Gary W. Boyd, PhD · Wells in the Wilderness
O Book! infinite sweetness! let my heart suck every letter, and a honey gain, precious for any grief in any part.George Herbert · The H. Scriptures I, in The Temple · 1633
Herbert was a country parson at Bemerton with three years of active ministry before tuberculosis took him at thirty-nine. He never published the poems; he sent the manuscript to a friend as he was dying, with instructions to burn it if he judged it of no use. In the same poem he calls Scripture the glass that mends the looker’s eyes, and the well that washes what it shows — two images this volume has already met.
Week 11 · Day 4 · What the writer says he is doing
1 Kings 11 · 1 Chronicles 29 · 2 Chronicles 9
Choose your depth. Springs is a few minutes; Wells is the full dip; Aquifer is for the morning you have time to go down.
One of the strangest habits in the historical books is a formula that appears again and again and is almost always skipped by readers.
Are they not written in the Book of the Acts of Solomon?
A book we do not have. Named, cited, and treated as something the reader could go and check.
Kings does this constantly — the book of the annals of the kings of Israel, the book of the annals of the kings of Judah — roughly thirty times across the two books, at the close of nearly every reign.
And Chronicles does it with even more names.
Count how many named sources the writer of Chronicles cites. Then ask why a book claiming divine authority would bother to show a bibliography.
Three named prophetic records for one reign. And elsewhere the chronicler cites the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, the visions of Iddo the seer, the records of Shemaiah, the annotations of the prophet Iddo, the book of the kings of Judah and Israel.
None of those documents survives. All of them are named in Scripture as sources.
Which tells you what kind of book this is, and what kind it is not.
It is not a book that claims to have arrived without a history. It cites. It refers. It assumes a reader who might want to look further, and it names where further is.
And note what that does to a common assumption about inspiration. If God simply dictated the text, the source notes would be decoration — a pretense of research. Instead the writers say plainly that they consulted records, and the same books say plainly that the word of the LORD came to them.
Both. That is the consistent testimony of this slot across eleven weeks. Moses wrote and deposited. Jeremiah dictated to a scribe. Luke investigated. Hezekiah’s men copied. The Preacher weighed and arranged. And a chronicler worked from named archives.
The result, Paul says, is God-breathed.
And the habit tells you something about the intended reader. A writer who says are they not written in the annals is addressing someone who could plausibly go and look. The formula assumes an audience with access to archives and an interest in checking, which is a striking thing to assume about the readers of Scripture.
There is also a plain implication about the lost books that is worth stating without alarm. God did not preserve every true record. Ahijah’s prophecy was real and is gone. What was preserved is what was to be preserved — which is a claim about providence rather than about the value of the missing material.
Count how many named sources the writer of Chronicles cites. Then ask why a book claiming divine authority would bother to show a bibliography.
The citation formula in Kings varies slightly but is remarkably consistent: the rest of the acts of so-and-so, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the annals of the kings of Israel or Judah. It functions like a footnote, and it appears for almost every monarch in both kingdoms.
The chronicler’s sources are more often prophetic than royal — Samuel, Nathan, Gad, Ahijah, Iddo, Shemaiah, Jehu son of Hanani, and Isaiah are all named as having written records. Whether these were separate documents or sections within larger works is discussed at length and not settled.
Other lost writings are named elsewhere in Scripture: the Book of the Wars of the LORD in Numbers 21:14, and the Book of Jashar in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18. The canon quotes them and does not include them.
Paul does something comparable in the New Testament, quoting pagan poets at Athens and in Titus. Citing a source is not endorsing everything in it; it is using what is true in it, and Scripture does so openly.
Note the difference in emphasis between the two histories. Kings mostly cites royal annals; Chronicles mostly cites prophetic records. The chronicler is writing for a community rebuilding after exile and reaches, by preference, for the prophets rather than the court.
Look it upH1697 דִּבְרֵי divrei, the words or acts of · H5612 סֵפֶר sepher, book, record · H2374 חֹזֶה chozeh, seer · H7200 רֹאֶה roeh, seer
Note the Hebrew title of Chronicles itself: Divrei Hayamim, the words or acts of the days — built on the noun this volume studied in Week One. A book assembled from records is named with the word that means both what was said and what was done.
Where this touches1 Kings 11:41; 14:19, 29 · 1 Chronicles 29:29 · 2 Chronicles 9:29; 12:15; 13:22; 32:32 · Numbers 21:14 · Joshua 10:13 · Luke 1:1–4 (Week Two, Day Four). Jeremiah, Luke, John, Revelation, Peter, Moses, Paul, the prophets, the Proverbs collectors and Peter on Paul gave the earlier accounts.
Count how many named sources the writer of Chronicles cites. Then ask why a book claiming divine authority would bother to show a bibliography.
Scripture quotations are from the Berean Standard Bible, which is in the public domain and carries no restriction on its use.
drgaryboyd.com · Wells in the Wilderness · Volume I at the-dipper.netlify.app · Volume II at 365waystopraise.netlify.app
Contact anchored-institute.org/contact or drgaryboyd@gmail.com
The Word of God · The Dipper, Volume IV · Gary W. Boyd, PhD · The Anchored Institute
Licensed CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 — free to share and reprint with attribution, unchanged and not for sale.