The Word of God · The Dipper, Volume IV
Gary W. Boyd, PhD · Wells in the Wilderness
That there is a God I see. If ever this God hath revealed himself, it must bee in his word, and this must be it or none.Anne Bradstreet · To My Dear Children · c. 1656–1670
Bradstreet wrote this in a letter meant only for her own children, and she wrote it on the far side of doubt. A few lines earlier she admits that Satan had troubled her many times about the truth of the Scriptures, that she had never seen a miracle, and that she could not know whether the ones she read of were feigned. The sentence quoted here is where she came out.
Week 14 · Day 3 · The Word on a word
Proverbs 29 · 1 Samuel 3 · Berean Standard Bible
Choose your depth. Springs is a few minutes; Wells is the full dip; Aquifer is for the morning you have time to go down.
There is a verse painted on the walls of a great many church foyers and printed at the front of a great many strategic plans, and it does not mean what it is used to mean.
The King James renders the first clause: where there is no vision, the people perish. And it has been used for a century to argue that organizations need a compelling picture of the future.
The Hebrew word is chazon. It means a prophetic vision — revelation, what a seer receives from God. It is the word in the opening line of Isaiah and Nahum and Obadiah: the vision of Isaiah son of Amoz.
It never means a leader’s aspiration for his enterprise.
Look up Proverbs 29:18 in two translations and note what the first word becomes. Then read the second half of the verse, which is almost never quoted.
And the second clause, which is rarely quoted, settles the sense beyond argument.
But blessed is he who keeps the law.
That is Hebrew parallelism doing what it always does — the second line interpreting the first. No revelation, and people run wild. Keep the instruction, and be blessed. The contrast is between having God’s word and not having it, and the antidote named is torah.
The verse is about revelation and obedience, not about planning.
The verb translated cast off restraint or perish is the one used of Israel at the golden calf — Moses came down and saw that the people were running wild, because Aaron had let them get out of control. It describes a mob, not a decline.
So the picture is a nation with no word from God, behaving accordingly.
And Scripture shows us that nation. The days of the judges close with the line that everyone did what was right in his own eyes — and the era opens with a sentence about supply.
The word of the LORD was rare in those days; visions were not widespread. Same word. The scarcity is stated as a fact about the period, and the chapter that follows is about a boy who did not yet know the LORD hearing his name called in the dark.
None of which makes strategic planning wrong. Churches need direction and leaders should think about the future.
It is worth saying what the verse does support, because the misuse has obscured a real promise. A people with God’s word in front of them have something to restrain them that no leader’s agenda can supply, and a people without it will not be held together by anything else for long. That is a larger claim than the one usually made from the verse, and it is the one actually there.
It means this verse is not about that, and using it that way spends the authority of Scripture on something Scripture did not say. Which is the exact failure Jeremiah 23 was describing last week — God’s vocabulary attached to content He did not send.
Look up Proverbs 29:18 in two translations and note what the first word becomes. Then read the second half of the verse, which is almost never quoted.
Chazon occurs about thirty-five times, mostly in the prophets, and is closely related to chozeh, seer, and chazah, to see or behold in vision. Several prophetic books open by labeling themselves a chazon, which makes the term something close to a genre marker.
The verb in the first clause, para, means to let loose, unbind, or let go of restraint. It is used of unbound hair, of ignoring instruction in Proverbs, and of the scene at the golden calf. Modern translations render it cast off restraint or run wild; the King James perish reflects an older reading and is the source of most of the misuse.
The verse is a proverb, which means its two lines are meant to be read against each other. Reading half a proverb is like reading half an equation, and this is the most common instance of it in English-speaking church life.
1 Samuel 3:1 and Amos 8:11–12 both describe famine conditions — not a famine of bread or thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD, with men staggering from sea to sea searching for it and not finding it. Scripture treats the absence of revelation as a judgment.
Proverbs 29 is one of the Hezekiah-collection chapters from Week Nine — part of the material copied out two and a half centuries after Solomon. The verse about revelation and restraint was preserved by scribes doing exactly the work it commends.
Look it upH2377 חָזוֹן chazon, vision, revelation · H6544 פָּרַע para, to let loose, cast off restraint · H8451 תּוֹרָה torah, instruction, law · H2374 חֹזֶה chozeh, seer
Where this touchesProverbs 29:18 · 1 Samuel 3:1–21 · Judges 21:25 · Exodus 32:25 · Amos 8:11–12 · Jeremiah 23:33–40 (Week Thirteen, Day Three). The earlier word studies were dabar, theopneustos, logos, torah, graphe, emeth, amen, the messenger formula, sepher, edut, imrah, logia and massa.
Look up Proverbs 29:18 in two translations and note what the first word becomes. Then read the second half of the verse, which is almost never quoted.
Scripture quotations are from the Berean Standard Bible, which is in the public domain and carries no restriction on its use.
drgaryboyd.com · Wells in the Wilderness · Volume I at the-dipper.netlify.app · Volume II at 365waystopraise.netlify.app
Contact anchored-institute.org/contact or drgaryboyd@gmail.com
The Word of God · The Dipper, Volume IV · Gary W. Boyd, PhD · The Anchored Institute
Licensed CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 — free to share and reprint with attribution, unchanged and not for sale.