The Word of God · The Dipper, Volume IV
Gary W. Boyd, PhD · Wells in the Wilderness
I seemed often to see so much light exhibited by every sentence, and such a refreshing food communicated, that I could not get along in reading; often dwelling long on one sentence, to see the wonders contained in it.Jonathan Edwards · Personal Narrative · c. 1740
Edwards is describing his early twenties in New York. The complaint in the middle of it is the part worth noticing — he could not get along in reading, because he kept stopping. A man who read as much as anyone in his century says the trouble with Scripture was that it would not let him make progress.
Week 19 · Day 6 · One verse, all the way down
Proverbs 30:5–6 · Berean Standard Bible
Choose your depth. Springs is a few minutes; Wells is the full dip; Aquifer is for the morning you have time to go down.
A man named Agur, who appears nowhere else in Scripture, opens his section of Proverbs by saying he is the most ignorant of men, has not learned wisdom, and does not have knowledge of the Holy One.
Then he asks a series of unanswerable questions — who has gone up to heaven and come down, who has gathered the wind in the hollow of his hands, what is His name and the name of His son, if you know?
And then, having established that he knows nothing, he says the one thing he does know.
Every word of God is flawless; He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.
Find the two halves of Proverbs 30:5 and note that the second half is about a person, not a book. Then read verse 6 and see what the pair is guarding against.
Two halves, and they are not about the same thing, which is the whole interest of the verse.
The first half is about the words: flawless — the refining word from Week Five, tested and pure, with nothing left in it that fire could take out.
The second half is about a person: He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.
Agur does not say the words are a shield. He says the words are pure, and then that God is the shelter.
Which is a distinction this volume has tried to keep for nineteen weeks. A man does not take refuge in a text. He takes refuge in the One the text is about — and the reason he can trust that refuge is that the words describing it have been tested.
The purity of the word is the ground of the confidence. The shelter is a Person.
And then verse 6, immediately, without a paragraph break:
Do not add to His words, or He will rebuke you and prove you a liar.
Which is Week Four’s command, and Deuteronomy’s, and Revelation’s — and here it is attached directly to the purity claim. The logic is exact: if every word has been through the fire, then anything you add has not.
That is why adding is called lying rather than merely erring. Not because the addition is necessarily false in itself, but because presenting it as His words claims a refining it never went through.
There is also something worth noticing about who says it. Agur is not a prophet, a priest, or a king. He is a man who opens by admitting he is stupid and has not learned wisdom — and his three verses are as compact a statement of the doctrine of Scripture as anything in the Bible. The volume has been quoting kings and apostles for nineteen weeks; this comes from a man nobody can identify.
A man who admits he knows nothing, in three verses, gives the whole doctrine: the words are tested, the shelter is a Person, and nothing of yours goes in the pile.
Find the two halves of Proverbs 30:5 and note that the second half is about a person, not a book. Then read verse 6 and see what the pair is guarding against.
Agur son of Jakeh is named only here, and nothing else is known about him. The name is not Israelite in form, and the same is true of King Lemuel in the next chapter. Two of the named contributors to Proverbs appear to be outsiders, and their material was kept.
The word rendered flawless or tested is tsaraph, the refiner’s word from Psalm 12:6 and Psalm 18:30. Proverbs 30:5 and Psalm 18:30 are nearly identical in Hebrew, which suggests Agur is quoting a known line rather than composing one.
The questions in verses 2–4 have been read as genuine humility, as irony against overconfident teachers, and as a deliberate setup for the answer in verse 5. The third reading fits the structure: the man who cannot answer any of the questions knows where the answers are kept.
The command not to add appears at least four times in Scripture — Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32, here, and Revelation 22:18. In every case it is attached to a claim about the sufficiency or purity of what has already been given.
The image of God as a shield runs through the Psalms — He is a shield around me, my shield and the horn of my salvation, the LORD God is a sun and shield. Agur is not inventing the second half of his verse any more than the first; both halves quote the settled vocabulary of Israel’s worship.
Look it upH565 אִמְרָה imrah, saying, word · H6884 צָרַף tsaraph, to refine, test · H4043 מָגֵן magen, shield · H2620 חָסָה chasah, to take refuge
Where this touchesProverbs 30:1–6 · Psalm 12:6 (Week Five, Day Six) · Psalm 18:30 · Deuteronomy 4:2 · Revelation 22:18–19 (Week Four, Day Four). Psalm 19, 2 Timothy 3:16–17, Isaiah 55:10–11, Matthew 24:35, Psalm 12:6, Matthew 5:18, Romans 15:4, Hebrews 4:12, Psalm 119:89, Joshua 21:45, Isaiah 66:2, Psalm 138:2, Jeremiah 1:12, Hebrews 1:1–2, Psalm 33:6, Deuteronomy 29:29, John 5:39–40 and Romans 10:17 were the earlier single-verse days.
Find the two halves of Proverbs 30:5 and note that the second half is about a person, not a book. Then read verse 6 and see what the pair is guarding against.
Scripture quotations are from the Berean Standard Bible, which is in the public domain and carries no restriction on its use.
drgaryboyd.com · Wells in the Wilderness · Volume I at the-dipper.netlify.app · Volume II at 365waystopraise.netlify.app
Contact anchored-institute.org/contact or drgaryboyd@gmail.com
The Word of God · The Dipper, Volume IV · Gary W. Boyd, PhD · The Anchored Institute
Licensed CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 — free to share and reprint with attribution, unchanged and not for sale.